GitLab Experiment Platform
=================

<img alt="experiment" src="/uploads/60990b2dbf4c0406bbf8b7f998de2dea/experiment.png" align="right" width="40%">

**A comprehensive experimentation platform for building data-driven organizations**

GitLab Experiment is an enterprise-grade experimentation framework that enables teams to validate hypotheses, optimize
user experiences, and make evidence-based product decisions at scale.
Built on years of production experience at GitLab, this platform provides the foundation for a mature experimentation
culture across your entire organization.

At GitLab, we run experiments as A/B/n tests and review the data they generate.
From that data, we determine the best performing code path and promote it as the new default, or revert back to the
original code path.
You can read our [Experiment Guide](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/experiment_guide/) to learn how we use this
gem internally at GitLab.

[[_TOC_]]

## Why GitLab Experiment?

### Built for Scale and Reliability
- **Production-tested** at GitLab scale with millions of users
- **Type-safe and testable** with comprehensive RSpec support
- **Framework agnostic** - works with Rails, Sinatra, or standalone Ruby applications
- **Redis-backed caching** for consistent user experiences across sessions
- **GDPR-compliant** with anonymous tracking and built-in DNT (Do Not Track) support

### Designed for Teams
- **Developer-friendly DSL** that reads like natural language
- **Organized experiment classes** that live alongside your application code
- **Built-in generators** for rapid experiment creation
- **Comprehensive testing support** with custom RSpec matchers
- **Rails integration** with automatic middleware mounting and view helpers

### Enterprise-Ready Features
- **Flexible rollout strategies** (percent-based, random, round-robin, or custom)
- **Advanced segmentation** to target specific user populations
- **Multi-variant testing** (A/B/n) with unlimited experimental paths
- **Progressive rollouts** with the `only_assigned` feature
- **Context migrations** for evolving experiments without losing data
- **Integration-ready** with existing feature flag systems (Flipper, Unleash, etc.)

<br clear="all">

## Use Cases Across Your Organization

### Product Teams: Optimize User Experiences
- **Onboarding flows**: Test different signup sequences to maximize activation
- **UI/UX changes**: Validate design decisions with real user behavior data
- **Feature rollouts**: Gradually release features to measure impact before full deployment
- **Pricing experiments**: Test different pricing strategies and messaging

### Growth Teams: Drive Conversion
- **Call-to-action optimization**: Test button colors, copy, and placement
- **Landing page variations**: Experiment with different value propositions
- **Email campaigns**: A/B test subject lines and content
- **Trial conversion**: Optimize paths from trial to paid subscriptions

### Engineering Teams: Safe Deployments
- **Performance optimizations**: Compare algorithm implementations under real load
- **Architecture changes**: Validate new code paths before full migration
- **API versions**: Run multiple API implementations side-by-side
- **Infrastructure experiments**: Test different caching or database strategies

### Data Science Teams: Recommendation Systems
- **Algorithm tuning**: Compare ML model variations in production
- **Personalization**: Test different recommendation strategies
- **Search ranking**: Optimize search results based on user engagement
- **Content discovery**: Experiment with different content surfaces

## Platform Capabilities

### Core Experimentation Features

**Multi-variant Testing (A/B/n)**
Run experiments with any number of variants, not just A/B tests. Perfect for testing multiple approaches simultaneously.

**Smart Segmentation**
Route specific user populations to predetermined variants based on business rules, ensuring consistent experiences for
targeted groups.

**Progressive Rollouts**
Use the `only_assigned` feature to show experimental features only to users already in the experiment, enabling
controlled expansion.

**Context Flexibility**
Experiments can be sticky to users, projects, organizations, or any combination - enabling complex scenarios beyond
user-centric testing.

**Anonymous Tracking**
Built-in privacy protection with anonymous context keys, automatic cookie migration, and GDPR compliance.

**Automatic Assignment Tracking**
Every experiment automatically tracks an `:assignment` event when it runs - zero configuration required. Combined with
the anonymous context key, this gives your data team a complete picture of variant distribution and funnel entry without
any additional instrumentation.

**Client-Side Integration**
Seamlessly extend experiments to the frontend with JavaScript integration, enabling full-stack experimentation.

**Inline and Class-Based APIs**
Define experiments inline with blocks for quick iterations, or use dedicated experiment classes for complex logic - or
combine both. Class-based experiments define default behaviors that can be overridden inline at any call site, giving
teams the flexibility to start simple and evolve without rewriting:

```ruby
experiment(:pill_color, actor: current_user) do |e|
  e.control { '<strong>control</strong>' }
end
```

**Context as a Design Framework**
Context is the most important design decision in any experiment. It determines stickiness, cache behavior, and how
events are correlated. Choose per-user context for personalization experiments, per-project for infrastructure tests,
per-group for organizational rollouts, or combine dimensions for precision targeting. This flexibility enables
experimentation strategies that go far beyond simple user-centric A/B tests.

**Decoupled Assignment with Publish**
Surface experiment assignments to the client layer without executing server-side behavior using `publish`. This enables
frontend-only experiments, pre-assignment in `before_action` hooks, and scenarios where variant data needs to be
available across the stack without triggering server-side code paths:

```ruby
before_action -> { experiment(:pill_color, actor: current_user).publish }, only: [:show]
```

### Integration Ecosystem

**Feature Flag Integration**
Connect with existing feature flag systems like Flipper or Unleash through custom rollout strategies.

**Analytics Integration**
Flexible tracking callbacks integrate with any analytics platform - Snowplow, Amplitude, Mixpanel, or your data
warehouse.

**Monitoring and Observability**
Built-in logging and callbacks for integration with APM tools and monitoring systems.

**Email and Markdown**
Special middleware for tracking experiments in email links and static content.

### Terminology

When we discuss the platform, we use specific terms that are worth understanding:

- **experiment** - Any deviation of code paths we want to test
- **context** - Identifies a consistent experience (user, project, session, etc.)
- **control** - The default or "original" code path
- **candidate** - One experimental code path (used in A/B tests)
- **variant(s)** - Multiple experimental paths (used in A/B/n tests)
- **behaviors** - All possible code paths (control + all variants)
- **rollout strategy** - Logic determining if an experiment is enabled and how variants are assigned
- **segmentation** - Rules for routing specific contexts to predetermined variants
- **exclusion** - Rules for keeping contexts out of experiments entirely

<br clear="all">

## Quick Start: From Zero to Experiment in 5 Minutes

### Installation

Add the gem to your Gemfile and then `bundle install`.

```ruby
gem 'gitlab-experiment'
```

If you're using Rails, install the initializer which provides basic configuration, documentation, and the base
experiment class:

```shell
$ rails generate gitlab:experiment:install
```

### Your First Experiment

Let's create a real-world experiment to optimize a call-to-action button.
This example demonstrates the power of the platform while remaining practical.

#### Step 1: Generate the experiment

**Hypothesis**: A more prominent call-to-action button will increase conversion rates

```shell
$ rails generate gitlab:experiment signup_cta
```

This creates `app/experiments/signup_cta_experiment.rb` with helpful inline documentation.

#### Step 2: Define your experiment class

```ruby
class SignupCtaExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Define the control (current experience)
  control { 'btn-default' }
  
  # Define the candidate (new experience to test)
  candidate { 'btn-primary btn-lg' }
  
  # Optional: Exclude certain users
  exclude :existing_customers
  
  # Optional: Track when the experiment runs
  after_run :log_experiment_assignment
  
  private
  
  def existing_customers
    context.actor&.subscribed?
  end
  
  def log_experiment_assignment
    Rails.logger.info("User assigned to #{assigned.name} variant")
  end
end
```

#### Step 3: Use the experiment in your view

```haml
-# The experiment is sticky to the current user
-# Anonymous users get a cookie-based assignment
%button{ class: experiment(:signup_cta, actor: current_user).run }
  Start Free Trial
```

#### Step 4: Track engagement

```ruby
# In your controller, track when users click the button
def create_trial
  experiment(:signup_cta, actor: current_user).track(:signup_completed)
  
  # ... rest of your trial creation logic
end
```

**That's it!** Your experiment is now running, collecting data, and providing consistent experiences to your users.

## Real-World Examples

### Example 1: Onboarding Flow Optimization

**Business Context**: Product team wants to increase new user activation by testing different onboarding sequences.

```ruby
class OnboardingFlowExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Three different onboarding approaches
  control { :standard_tour }      # Current 5-step tour
  variant(:quick) { :quick_start }   # Streamlined 2-step flow
  variant(:video) { :video_guide }   # Video-based walkthrough
  
  # Only show to new users who haven't completed onboarding
  exclude :has_completed_onboarding
  
  # Segment enterprise trial users to the standard tour
  segment :enterprise_trial?, variant: :control
  
  private
  
  def has_completed_onboarding
    context.actor&.onboarding_completed_at.present?
  end
  
  def enterprise_trial?
    context.actor&.trial_type == 'enterprise'
  end
end

# In your onboarding controller
def show
  flow = experiment(:onboarding_flow, actor: current_user).run
  render_onboarding_flow(flow)
end

# Track completion
def complete
  experiment(:onboarding_flow, actor: current_user).track(:completed)
  # ... mark user as onboarded
end
```

### Example 2: Pricing Page Experiment

**Business Context**: Growth team wants to test whether showing annual savings increases annual plan selection.

```ruby
class PricingDisplayExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  control { :monthly_default }
  candidate { :annual_default_with_savings }
  
  # Only run for unauthenticated visitors
  exclude :authenticated_user
  
  private
  
  def authenticated_user
    context.actor.present?
  end
end

# In your pricing view
- pricing_variant = experiment(:pricing_display, actor: current_user).run
= render "pricing/#{pricing_variant}"

# Track plan selections
def select_plan
  experiment(:pricing_display, actor: current_user).track(:plan_selected, 
    value: params[:plan_type] == 'annual' ? 1 : 0
  )
end
```

### Example 3: Algorithm Performance Test

**Business Context**: Engineering team wants to compare a new search algorithm's performance before full rollout.

```ruby
class SearchAlgorithmExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  control { SearchEngine::Legacy }
  candidate { SearchEngine::Neural }
  
  # Only run for 25% of searches
  default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 75, candidate: 25 }
  
  # Exclude searches from API (higher SLA requirements)
  exclude :api_request
  
  # Track performance metrics
  after_run :record_search_timing
  
  private
  
  def api_request
    context.request&.path&.start_with?('/api/')
  end
  
  def record_search_timing
    # Custom metrics tracking
  end
end

# In your search service
def search(query)
  algorithm = experiment(:search_algorithm, 
    actor: current_user,
    project: current_project
  ).run
  
  results = algorithm.search(query)
  
  experiment(:search_algorithm, 
    actor: current_user, 
    project: current_project
  ).track(:search_completed, value: results.count)
  
  results
end
```

### Example 4: Progressive Feature Rollout

**Business Context**: Launching a new AI-assisted code review feature, want to expand gradually to manage load and gather feedback.

```ruby
class AiCodeReviewExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  control { false }  # Feature disabled
  candidate { true } # Feature enabled
  
  # Start with 5% rollout
  default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 95, candidate: 5 }
  
  # Segment beta program users to always get the feature
  segment :beta_user?, variant: :candidate
  
  # Exclude free tier (computational cost consideration)
  exclude :free_tier_user
  
  private
  
  def beta_user?
    context.actor&.beta_features_enabled?
  end
  
  def free_tier_user
    context.actor&.subscription_tier == 'free'
  end
end

# In your merge request view
- if experiment(:ai_code_review, actor: current_user, project: @project).run
  .ai-code-review-panel
    = render 'ai_suggestions'

# Track usage
def apply_ai_suggestion
  experiment(:ai_code_review, actor: current_user, project: @project)
    .track(:suggestion_applied)
end
```

## Platform Integration Patterns

### Integration with Feature Flags (Flipper)

Many organizations already use feature flag systems. GitLab Experiment integrates seamlessly:

```ruby
module Gitlab::Experiment::Rollout
  class Flipper < Percent
    def enabled?
      ::Flipper.enabled?(experiment.name, experiment_actor)
    end
    
    def experiment_actor
      Struct.new(:flipper_id).new("Experiment;#{id}")
    end
  end
end

# Configure globally
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.default_rollout = Gitlab::Experiment::Rollout::Flipper.new
end

# Now Flipper controls your experiments
Flipper.enable_percentage_of_actors(:signup_cta, 50)
```

### Integration with Analytics Platforms

Connect experiments to your analytics stack:

```ruby
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.tracking_behavior = lambda do |event_name, **data|
    # Snowplow
    SnowplowTracker.track_struct_event(
      category: 'experiment',
      action: event_name,
      property: data[:experiment],
      context: [{ schema: 'experiment_context', data: data }]
    )
    
    # Amplitude (example)
    Amplitude.track(
      user_id: data[:key], # Anonymous experiment key
      event_type: "experiment_#{event_name}",
      event_properties: data
    )
    
    # Custom data warehouse
    DataWarehouse.log_experiment_event(event_name, data)
  end
end
```

### Multi-Application Consistency

Share experiment assignments across multiple applications:

```ruby
# Shared Redis cache
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.cache = Gitlab::Experiment::Cache::RedisHashStore.new(
    Redis.new(url: ENV['REDIS_URL']),
    expires_in: 30.days
  )
end

# Now experiments stay consistent across your web app, API, and background jobs
```

## Advanced Features

### Multi-Variant (A/B/n) Testing

Test multiple variations simultaneously to find the optimal solution:

```ruby
class NotificationStyleExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Test three different notification approaches
  control { :banner }        # Current: banner at top
  variant(:toast) { :toast } # Toast notification
  variant(:modal) { :modal } # Modal dialog
  
  # Distribute traffic evenly across all three
  default_rollout :percent, 
    distribution: { control: 34, toast: 33, modal: 33 }
  
  # Exclude mobile users (different UI constraints)
  exclude :mobile_user
  
  # Segment power users to toast (less intrusive)
  segment :power_user?, variant: :toast
  
  private
  
  def mobile_user
    context.request&.user_agent&.match?(/Mobile/)
  end
  
  def power_user?
    context.actor&.actions_count > 1000
  end
end
```

### Exclusion Rules

Keep contexts out of experiments entirely based on business rules:

```ruby
class FeatureExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Exclude existing customers (only test on prospects)
  exclude :existing_customer
  
  # Exclude during maintenance windows
  exclude -> { context.project&.under_maintenance? }
  
  # Exclude if feature is explicitly disabled
  exclude :feature_disabled
  
  private
  
  def existing_customer
    context.actor&.subscribed?
  end
  
  def feature_disabled
    !FeatureFlag.enabled?(:allow_experiment, context.actor)
  end
end
```

**Key behaviors:**
- Excluded users always receive the control experience
- No tracking events are recorded for excluded users
- Exclusion rules are evaluated in order, first match wins
- Exclusions improve performance by exiting early

**Inline exclusion** is also supported:

```ruby
experiment(:feature, actor: current_user) do |e|
  e.exclude! unless can?(current_user, :manage, project)
  e.control { 'standard' }
  e.candidate { 'enhanced' }
end
```

Note: Although tracking calls will be ignored on all exclusions, you may want to check exclusion yourself in expensive
custom logic by calling the `should_track?` or `excluded?` methods.

Note: When using exclusion rules it's important to understand that the control assignment is cached, which improves
future experiment run performance but can be a gotcha around caching.

Note: Exclusion rules aren't the best way to determine if an experiment is enabled. There's an `enabled?` method that
can be overridden to have a high-level way of determining if an experiment should be running and tracking at all. This
`enabled?` check should be as efficient as possible because it's the first early opt out path an experiment can
implement. This can be seen in [How Experiments Work (Technical)](#how-experiments-work-technical).

### Segmentation Rules

Route specific populations to predetermined variants:

```ruby
class NewFeatureExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Route VIP customers to the new feature
  segment :vip_customer?, variant: :candidate
  
  # Route enterprise trial users to the enhanced experience
  segment :enterprise_trial?, variant: :candidate
  
  # Route users from specific campaigns to specific variants
  segment(variant: :candidate) { context.campaign == 'product_launch_2024' }
  
  private
  
  def vip_customer?
    context.actor&.account_value > 100_000
  end
  
  def enterprise_trial?
    context.actor&.trial_tier == 'enterprise'
  end
end
```

**Key behaviors:**
- Segmentation rules are evaluated in order, first match wins
- Segmented assignments are cached for consistency
- Perfect for gradually expanding successful experiments
- Enables sophisticated population targeting

### Lifecycle Callbacks

Execute custom logic at different stages of experiment execution:

```ruby
class PerformanceExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Run before the variant is determined
  before_run :log_experiment_start
  
  # Run after the variant is executed
  after_run :record_timing_metrics, :notify_analytics_team
  
  # Wrap the entire execution
  around_run do |experiment, block|
    start_time = Time.current
    result = block.call
    duration = Time.current - start_time
    
    Metrics.record("experiment.#{experiment.name}.duration", duration)
    result
  end
  
  private
  
  def log_experiment_start
    Rails.logger.info("Starting experiment: #{name}")
  end
  
  def record_timing_metrics
    # Custom timing logic
  end
  
  def notify_analytics_team
    # Send to analytics platform
  end
end
```

**Use cases for callbacks:**
- Performance monitoring and APM integration
- Custom analytics and data warehouse updates
- Experiment-specific logging and debugging
- Integration with external systems

### Progressive Rollout with `only_assigned`

Control experiment expansion by only showing features to users already assigned to the experiment.
This is critical for managing blast radius and controlled rollouts:

**The Challenge**: You launch an experiment to 10% of new signups. Later, you want to show experimental features on other pages, but only to users already in the experiment - not expand to 10% of all users across the platform.

**The Solution**: Use `only_assigned: true`

```ruby
# Step 1: Assign users during signup (10% of new signups)
class RegistrationsController < ApplicationController
  def create
    user = User.create!(user_params)
    
    # This assigns 10% to candidate, 90% to control
    experiment(:onboarding_v2, actor: user).publish
    
    redirect_to dashboard_path
  end
end

# Step 2: Later, show features only to those already assigned
class DashboardController < ApplicationController
  def show
    # This will NOT expand the experiment to 10% of all users
    # Only users assigned in Step 1 will see the experimental UI
    @show_new_features = experiment(:onboarding_v2, 
      actor: current_user, 
      only_assigned: true
    ).assigned.name == 'candidate'
  end
end

# Step 3: Show UI conditionally across the app
- if experiment(:onboarding_v2, actor: current_user, only_assigned: true).run
  .new-onboarding-features
    = render 'enhanced_dashboard'
```

**Behavior with `only_assigned: true`:**
- ✅ If user has a cached assignment (control or candidate) → returns that variant and tracks
- ✅ If user has no cached assignment → returns control, no tracking
- ✅ Experiment reach stays controlled
- ✅ Perfect for multi-page experimental experiences

> **Note:** `only_assigned: true` relies on cached assignments. Control variants are cached
> by default (see [Advanced: Caching Configuration](#advanced-caching-configuration)) so that
> bucketed control users are included in `only_assigned` tracking. If you set
> `cache_control: false`, control users will appear unassigned at secondary sites and be
> excluded from tracking there.

**Real-world use cases:**
- **Post-signup experiences**: Assign at signup, show features throughout the app
- **Gradual feature expansion**: Roll out to 5%, then add more touchpoints without expanding population
- **Cleanup phases**: Maintain experience for existing participants while preventing new assignments
- **A/B testing with multiple surfaces**: Test a hypothesis across multiple pages without assignment leakage

### Custom Rollout Strategies

The platform supports multiple rollout strategies out of the box, and you can create custom strategies for your specific
needs.

**Built-in strategies:**
- [`Percent`](lib/gitlab/experiment/rollout/percent.rb) - Consistent percentage-based assignment (default, recommended)
- [`Random`](lib/gitlab/experiment/rollout/random.rb) - True random assignment (useful for load testing)
- [`RoundRobin`](lib/gitlab/experiment/rollout/round_robin.rb) - Cycle through variants (requires caching)
- [`Base`](lib/gitlab/experiment/rollout.rb) - Useful for building custom rollout strategies

```ruby
class LoadTestExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Randomly test two different caching strategies
  default_rollout :random
  
  control { CacheStrategy::Redis }
  candidate { CacheStrategy::Memcached }
end

class GradualRolloutExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Start with 5% in the new experience
  default_rollout :percent, 
    distribution: { control: 95, candidate: 5 }
end
```

See the [Advanced: Custom Rollout Strategies](#advanced-custom-rollout-strategies) section for building your own
integration with feature flag systems.

## Organizational Best Practices

### Experiment Lifecycle Management

**1. Hypothesis Formation**
```ruby
# Document your hypothesis in the experiment class
class CheckoutFlowExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Hypothesis: Reducing checkout steps from 3 to 2 will increase completion rate
  # Success metric: 5% increase in checkout completion
  # Target: All free trial users
  # Duration: 2 weeks
  # Owner: @growth-team
  
  control { :three_step_checkout }
  candidate { :two_step_checkout }
  
  exclude :existing_customer
end
```

**2. Gradual Rollout**
```ruby
# Week 1: 5% rollout
default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 95, candidate: 5 }

# Week 2: Increase to 25% if metrics look good
default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 75, candidate: 25 }

# Week 3: Full rollout if successful
default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 0, candidate: 100 }
```

**3. Monitoring and Alerting**
```ruby
class CriticalPathExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  after_run :monitor_performance
  after_run :alert_on_errors
  
  private
  
  def monitor_performance
    Metrics.increment("experiment.#{name}.#{assigned.name}")
  end
  
  def alert_on_errors
    if context.error_rate > threshold
      PagerDuty.alert("High error rate in #{name}")
    end
  end
end
```

**4. Experiment Cleanup**
```ruby
# When experiment is conclusive, clean up:
# 1. Remove the experiment code
# 2. Promote winner to production
# 3. Document learnings

# Before cleanup, archive results:
experiment(:checkout_flow).publish
# Export data for historical analysis
```

### Team Collaboration Patterns

**Product + Engineering + Data Science**
```ruby
class CollaborativeExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Product defines the hypothesis and variants
  control { :current_flow }
  candidate { :new_flow }
  
  # Engineering defines segmentation and rollout
  segment :beta_users, variant: :candidate
  default_rollout :percent, distribution: { control: 90, candidate: 10 }
  
  # Data science defines tracking and metrics
  after_run :track_funnel_step
  
  def track_funnel_step
    Analytics.track_experiment_step(
      experiment: name,
      variant: assigned.name,
      funnel_position: context.step,
      user_segment: context.actor&.segment
    )
  end
end
```

### Testing Strategy

Write tests for your experiments using the included RSpec matchers:

```ruby
RSpec.describe CheckoutFlowExperiment do
  describe 'segmentation' do
    it 'routes existing customers to control' do
      customer = create(:user, :with_subscription)
      expect(experiment(:checkout_flow)).to exclude(actor: customer)
    end
    
    it 'routes enterprise trials to candidate' do
      trial = create(:user, :enterprise_trial)
      expect(experiment(:checkout_flow))
        .to segment(actor: trial).into(:candidate)
    end
  end
  
  describe 'tracking' do
    it 'tracks checkout completion' do
      expect(experiment(:checkout_flow)).to track(:completed)
        .on_next_instance
      
      CheckoutService.complete(user: user)
    end
  end
end
```

### Naming Conventions

Establish clear naming conventions for your organization:

```ruby
# Good: Descriptive experiment names
class OnboardingFlowV2Experiment < ApplicationExperiment; end
class PricingPageAnnualFocusExperiment < ApplicationExperiment; end
class SearchAlgorithmNeuralExperiment < ApplicationExperiment; end

# Avoid: Vague names
class TestExperiment < ApplicationExperiment; end  # What are we testing?
class ExperimentOne < ApplicationExperiment; end  # No context
```

## Technical Reference

### How Experiments Work (Technical)

Understanding the experiment resolution flow helps you design better experiments and debug issues:

**Decision tree for variant assignment:**

```mermaid
graph TD
    GP[General Pool/Population] --> Running?[Rollout Enabled?]
    Running? -->|Yes| Forced?[Forced Assignment?]
    Running? -->|No| Excluded[Control / No Tracking]
    Forced? -->|Yes / Cached| ForcedVariant[Forced Variant]
    Forced? -->|No| Cached?[Cached? / Pre-segmented?]
    Cached? -->|No| Excluded?
    Cached? -->|Yes| Cached[Cached Value]
    Excluded? -->|Yes / Cached| Excluded
    Excluded? -->|No| Segmented?
    Segmented? -->|Yes / Cached| VariantA
    Segmented? -->|No| Rollout[Rollout Resolve]
    Rollout --> Control
    Rollout -->|Cached| VariantA
    Rollout -->|Cached| VariantB
    Rollout -->|Cached| VariantN

class ForcedVariant,VariantA,VariantB,VariantN included
class Control,Excluded excluded
class Cached cached
```

**Key points:**
1. Rollout must be enabled for any variant assignment (including forced assignment)
2. Forced assignment takes priority over cache/exclusion/segmentation (via `glex_force` query parameter)
3. Cache provides consistency across calls
4. Segmentation takes priority over rollout
5. `only_assigned: true` exits early if no cache hit

### Experiment Context and Stickiness

Internally, experiments have what's referred to as the context "key" that represents the unique and anonymous id of a
given context. This allows us to assign the same variant between different calls to the experiment, is used in caching
and can be used in event data downstream. This context "key" is how an experiment remains "sticky" to a given context,
and is an important aspect to understand.

**Context defines stickiness** - experiments remain consistent by generating an anonymous key from the context:

```ruby
# Sticky to user - same user gets same variant everywhere
experiment(:feature, actor: current_user)

# Sticky to project - all users on a project get the same experience  
experiment(:feature, project: project)

# Sticky to user+project - same user gets same variant per project
experiment(:feature, actor: current_user, project: project)

# Custom stickiness - explicitly define what creates consistency
experiment(:feature, actor: current_user, project: project, sticky_to: project)
```

**The `actor` keyword has special behavior:**
- Anonymous users → temporary cookie-based assignment
- Upon sign-in → cookie migrates to user ID automatically
- Enables consistent experience across anonymous → authenticated journey

### Using Experiments Beyond Views

By default, `Gitlab::Experiment` injects itself into the controller, view, and mailer layers. This exposes the
`experiment` method application wide in those layers. Some experiments may extend outside of those layers however, so
you may want to include it elsewhere. For instance in an irb session or the rails console, or in all your service
objects, background jobs, or similar:

```ruby
# In all background jobs
class ApplicationJob < ActiveJob::Base
  include Gitlab::Experiment::Dsl
end

# In service objects
class ApplicationService
  include Gitlab::Experiment::Dsl
end

# In a console session
include Gitlab::Experiment::Dsl
experiment(:feature, actor: User.first).run
```

### Manual Variant Assignment

<details>
  <summary>You can also specify the variant manually...</summary>

Generally, defining segmentation rules is a better way to approach routing into specific variants, but it's possible to
explicitly specify the variant when running an experiment.

Caching: It's important to understand what this might do to your data during rollout, so use this with careful
consideration. Any time a specific variant is assigned manually, or through segmentation (including `:control`) it will
be cached for that context. That means that if you manually assign `:control`, that context will never be moved out of
the control unless you do it programmatically elsewhere.

```ruby
include Gitlab::Experiment::Dsl

# Assign the candidate manually.
ex = experiment(:pill_color, :red, actor: User.first) # => #<PillColorExperiment:0x..>

# Run the experiment -- returning the result.
ex.run # => "red"

# If caching is enabled this will remain sticky between calls.
experiment(:pill_color, actor: User.first).run # => "red"
```

</details>

### Forced Variant Assignment (QA/UAT)

For testing and validation purposes, you can force a specific variant assignment via a URL query parameter. This is
useful for QA testing in staging or production environments where you need to verify a specific variant's behavior.

**Configuration:**

Forced assignment is disabled by default. Enable it in your initializer:

```ruby
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.allow_forced_assignment = true
end
```

**Usage:**

Append the `glex_force` query parameter to any URL with the format `experiment_name:variant_name`:

```
https://your-app.com/signup?glex_force=myapp_signup_cta:candidate
```

The forced variant is written to the cache (Redis) on the same request, making it permanent for that context. The
query parameter only needs to be provided once -- after that, the variant is persisted in the cache like any normal
assignment.

#### Anonymous user (nil actor) -- initial assignment

This is the primary use case for QA testing signup flows and landing pages. The user is not signed in, so the actor is
nil and the experiment uses a cookie-based context key.

1. Anonymous user visits `https://your-app.com/signup?glex_force=signup_cta:candidate`
2. The forced variant `:candidate` is written to Redis under the cookie-based context key
3. The user signs in -- the standard cookie migration carries the forced variant to their real identity
4. All future requests use `:candidate` from Redis, permanently

This means a QA tester can force a variant before signup and have it follow the user through the entire
anonymous-to-authenticated journey.

#### Signed-in user -- initial assignment

When a signed-in user hasn't been assigned a variant yet, the force param assigns and caches it immediately:

```
https://your-app.com/dashboard?glex_force=new_feature:candidate
```

The variant is cached under the user's context key on this request. No further query parameter is needed.

#### Signed-in user -- re-assignment (overwriting an existing variant)

If a user was previously assigned `:control` (by the rollout strategy or a prior force), the force param overwrites
the cached value:

```
https://your-app.com/dashboard?glex_force=new_feature:candidate
```

The existing `:control` assignment in Redis is replaced with `:candidate`. This is useful when QA needs to switch a
user between variants without clearing the cache manually.

#### Disabled experiments and feature flags

Forced assignment requires the experiment to be enabled. If the experiment is disabled (as determined by the rollout
strategy's `enabled?` method), the `glex_force` parameter is ignored and normal resolution applies (which will assign
control).

This is intentional -- a disabled experiment may be disabled for valid reasons (incomplete implementation, known issues,
compliance constraints, etc.) and force assignment should not provide a way to bypass that decision. To use forced
assignment, ensure the experiment is enabled first through your rollout strategy.

**Important notes:**
- The experiment name in the parameter must match the full experiment name (including any configured `name_prefix`).
- If the variant name doesn't match a registered behavior, the forced assignment is ignored and normal variant resolution
  proceeds (typically resulting in the control variant).
- Forced assignment does not override a variant that was already set via the constructor or an explicit `assigned()`
  call within the same request.
- This feature requires a `request` object with `params` to be available in the experiment context.

> [!NOTE]
> Because forcing the variant ignores the exclusion/segmentation process it will cover up those types of errors so if your experiment relies on these types of logic this testing method should be avoided.

### Experiment Signature

The best way to understand the details of an experiment is through its signature. An example signature can be retrieved
by calling the `signature` method, and looks like the following:

```ruby
experiment(:example).signature # => {:variant=>"control", :experiment=>"example", :key=>"4d7aee..."}
```

An experiment signature is useful when tracking events and when using experiments on the client layer. The signature can
also contain the optional `migration_keys`, and `excluded` properties.

### Return Value

By default the return value of calling `experiment` is a `Gitlab::Experiment` instance, or whatever class the
experiment is resolved to, which likely inherits from `Gitlab::Experiment`. In simple cases you may want only the
results of running the experiment though. You can call `run` within the block to get the return value of the assigned
variant.

```ruby
# Normally an experiment instance.
experiment(:example) do |e|
  e.control { 'A' }
  e.candidate { 'B' }
end # => #<Gitlab::Experiment:0x...>

# But calling `run` causes the return value to be the result.
experiment(:example) do |e|
  e.control { 'A' }
  e.candidate { 'B' }
  e.run
end # => 'A'
```

### Context migrations

There are times when we need to change context while an experiment is running.
We make this possible by passing the migration data to the experiment.

Take for instance, that you might be using `version: 1` in your context currently.
To migrate this to `version: 2`, provide the portion of the context you wish to change using a `migrated_with` option.

In providing the context migration data, we can resolve an experience and its events all the way back.
This can also help in keeping our cache relevant.

```ruby
# First implementation.
experiment(:example, actor: current_user, version: 1)

# Migrate just the `:version` portion.
experiment(:example, actor: current_user, version: 2, migrated_with: { version: 1 })
```

You can add or remove context by providing a `migrated_from` option.
This approach expects a full context replacement -- i.e. what it was before you added or removed the new context key.

If you wanted to introduce a `version` to your context, provide the full previous context.

```ruby
# First implementation.
experiment(:example, actor: current_user)

# Migrate the full context of `{ actor: current_user }` to `{ actor: current_user, version: 1 }`.
experiment(:example, actor: current_user, version: 1, migrated_from: { actor: current_user })
```

When you migrate context, this information is included in the signature of the experiment.
This can be used downstream in event handling and reporting to resolve a series of events back to a single experience,
while also keeping everything anonymous.

An example of our experiment signature when we migrate would include the `migration_keys` property:

```ruby
ex = experiment(:example, version: 1)
ex.signature # => {:key=>"20d69a...", ...}

ex = experiment(:example, version: 2, migrated_from: { version: 1 })
ex.signature # => {:key=>"9e9d93...", :migration_keys=>["20d69a..."], ...}
```

### Cookies and the actor keyword

We use cookies to auto migrate an unknown value into a known value, often in the case of the current user.
The implementation of this uses the same concept outlined above with context migrations, but will happen automatically
for you if you use the `actor` keyword.

When you use the `actor: current_user` pattern in your context, the nil case is handled by setting a special cookie for
the experiment and then deleting the cookie, and migrating the context key to the one generated from the user when
they've signed in.

This cookie is a temporary, randomized uuid and isn't associated with a user.
When we can finally provide an actor, the context is auto migrated from the cookie to that actor.

```ruby
# The actor key is not present, so no cookie is set.
experiment(:example, project: project)

# The actor key is present but nil, so the cookie is set and used.
experiment(:example, actor: nil, project: project)

# The actor key is present and isn't nil, so the cookie value (if found) is
# migrated forward and the cookie is deleted.
experiment(:example, actor: current_user, project: project)
```

Note: The cookie is deleted when resolved, but can be assigned again if the `actor` is ever nil again.
A good example of this scenario would be on a sign in page.
When a potential user arrives, they would never be known, so a cookie would be set for them, and then resolved/removed
as soon as they signed in.
This process would repeat each time they arrived while not being signed in and can complicate reporting unless it's
handled well in the data layers.

Note: To read and write cookies, we provide the `request` from within the controller and views.
The cookie migration will happen automatically if the experiment is within those layers.
You'll need to provide the `request` as an option to the experiment if it's outside of the controller and views.

```ruby
experiment(:example, actor: current_user, request: request)
```

Note: For edge cases, you can pass the cookie through by assigning it yourself -- e.g. `actor:
request.cookie_jar.signed['example_id']`.
The cookie name is the full experiment name (including any configured prefix) with `_id` appended -- e.g.
`pill_color_id` for the `PillColorExperiment`.

### Client layer

Experiments that have been run (or published) during the request lifecycle can be pushed into to the client layer by
injecting the published experiments into javascript in a layout or view using something like:

```haml        
= javascript_tag(nonce: content_security_policy_nonce) do
  window.experiments = #{raw ApplicationExperiment.published_experiments.to_json};
```

The `window.experiments` object can then be used in your client implementation to determine experimental behavior at
that layer as well.
For instance, we can now access the `window.experiments.pill_color` object to get the variant that was assigned, if the
context was excluded, and to use the context key in our client side events.

## Adoption Guide for Organizations

### Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
1. **Install and configure** the gem
2. **Set up analytics integration** in the initializer
3. **Create a base experiment class** for your organization
4. **Run your first small experiment** (low-risk, high-visibility)

### Phase 2: Team Enablement (Week 3-4)
1. **Document your organization's patterns** (naming, testing, rollout)
2. **Train teams** on experiment lifecycle
3. **Establish experiment review process** (hypothesis → implementation → analysis)
4. **Run 2-3 experiments** across different teams

### Phase 3: Scale (Month 2+)
1. **Integrate with feature flag system** (if applicable)
2. **Build dashboards** for experiment monitoring
3. **Establish data review cadence** (weekly experiment reviews)
4. **Scale to 5-10 concurrent experiments**

### Common Pitfalls to Avoid

**❌ Don't: Run experiments without clear success metrics**
```ruby
class VagueExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # What are we trying to learn?
  control { :old_way }
  candidate { :new_way }
end
```

**✅ Do: Document hypothesis and success criteria**
```ruby
class CheckoutOptimizationExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  # Hypothesis: Showing trust badges increases checkout completion
  # Success Metric: 5% increase in completion rate
  # Target: Free trial users
  # Duration: 2 weeks
  
  control { :without_badges }
  candidate { :with_trust_badges }
end
```

**❌ Don't: Let experiments run indefinitely**
- Set time bounds for every experiment
- Review results at planned intervals
- Make a decision: promote winner, revert, or iterate

**✅ Do: Build experiment cleanup into your process**
- Schedule experiment review meetings
- Archive experiment results
- Clean up experiment code after conclusion

## Platform Configuration

The platform requires initial configuration to integrate with your analytics and infrastructure.

**Basic configuration** (in `config/initializers/gitlab_experiment.rb`):

```ruby
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  # How experiment events are tracked
  config.tracking_behavior = lambda do |event_name, **data|
    YourAnalytics.track(
      user_id: data[:key],  # Anonymous experiment key
      event: "experiment_#{event_name}",
      properties: data
    )
  end
  
  # How experiments are cached (recommended: Redis)
  config.cache = Gitlab::Experiment::Cache::RedisHashStore.new(
    Redis.new(url: ENV['REDIS_URL']),
    expires_in: 30.days
  )
  
  # Optional: Prefix all experiment names
  config.name_prefix = 'mycompany'
  
  # Optional: Default rollout strategy
  config.default_rollout = Gitlab::Experiment::Rollout::Percent.new
end
```

See the [complete initializer template](lib/generators/gitlab/experiment/install/templates/initializer.rb.tt) for all
configuration options.

### Advanced: Caching Configuration

**Why caching matters:**
- Ensures consistent user experience across sessions
- Improves performance (skip rollout logic after first assignment)
- Required for `only_assigned` functionality
- Enables context migrations

**Cache options:**
```ruby
# Option 1: Use Rails cache (simple)
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.cache = Rails.cache
end

# Option 2: Use Redis directly (recommended for scale)
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.cache = Gitlab::Experiment::Cache::RedisHashStore.new(
    Redis.new(url: ENV['REDIS_URL']),
    expires_in: 30.days
  )
end

# Option 3: No caching (deterministic rollout strategies only)
config.cache = nil
```

The gem includes the [`RedisHashStore`](lib/gitlab/experiment/cache/redis_hash_store.rb) cache store, which is
documented in its implementation.

**Important:** Caching changes how rollout strategies behave. Once cached, subsequent calls return the cached value regardless of rollout strategy changes.

**Control variant caching:**

By default, the gem caches `:control` assignments alongside variant assignments. This is what
makes `only_assigned: true` lookups include bucketed control users -- without it, control
users would appear unassigned at secondary tracking sites and would be silently excluded.

```ruby
# Disable globally (don't cache :control)
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.cache_control = false
end

# Or override per-rollout
class MyExperiment < ApplicationExperiment
  default_rollout :percent, cache_control: false
end
```

The `Random` rollout strategy intentionally opts out of caching `:control` regardless of this
setting, because its convergence model depends on re-rolling control assignments on every
visit until a non-control variant is picked.

**Operational note:** With control caching enabled, `Percent` and `RoundRobin` cache hashes
grow with every bucketed user, not just users assigned to a candidate variant. For
long-running experiments the cache will be roughly `1 / candidate_percentage` the size it
would have been before. Plan periodic cleanup using your store's deletion API -- for the
`RedisHashStore`, that's `experiment.cache.store.clear(key: experiment.name)`.

### Advanced: Custom Rollout Strategies

Build custom integrations with your existing infrastructure:

**Example: Flipper Integration**

```ruby
# We put it in this module namespace so we can get easy resolution when
# using `default_rollout :flipper` in our usage later. 
module Gitlab::Experiment::Rollout
  class Flipper < Percent
    def enabled?
      ::Flipper.enabled?(experiment.name, self)
    end

    def flipper_id
      "Experiment;#{id}"
    end
  end
end
```

So, Flipper needs something that responds to `flipper_id`, and since our experiment "id" (which is also our context key)
is unique and consistent, we're going to give that to Flipper to manage things like percentage of actors etc.
You might want to consider something more complex here if you're using things that can be flipper actors in your
experiment context.

Anyway, now you can use your custom `Flipper` rollout strategy by instantiating it in configuration:

```ruby
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.default_rollout = Gitlab::Experiment::Rollout::Flipper.new
end
```

Or if you don't want to make that change globally, you can use it in specific experiment classes:

```ruby
class PillColorExperiment < Gitlab::Experiment # OR ApplicationExperiment
  # ...registered behaviors

  default_rollout :flipper,
    distribution: { control: 26, red: 37, blue: 37 } # optionally specify distribution
end
```

Now, enabling or disabling the Flipper feature flag will control if the experiment is enabled or not.
If the experiment is enabled, as determined by our custom rollout strategy, the standard resolution logic will be
executed, and a variant (or control) will be assigned.

```ruby
experiment(:pill_color).enabled? # => false
experiment(:pill_color).assigned.name # => "control"

# Now we can enable the feature flag to enable the experiment.
Flipper.enable(:pill_color) # => true

experiment(:pill_color).enabled? # => true
experiment(:pill_color).assigned.name # => "red"
```

### Middleware

There are times when you'll need to do link tracking in email templates, or markdown content -- or other places you
won't be able to implement tracking.
For these cases a middleware layer that can redirect to a given URL while also tracking that the URL was visited has
been provided.

In Rails this middleware is mounted automatically, with a base path of what's been configured for `mount_at`.
If this path is nil, the middleware won't be mounted at all.

```ruby
Gitlab::Experiment.configure do |config|
  config.mount_at = '/experiment'

  # Only redirect on permitted domains.
  config.redirect_url_validator = ->(url) { (url = URI.parse(url)) && url.host == 'gitlab.com' }    
end
```

Once configured to be mounted, the experiment tracking redirect URLs can be generated using the Rails route helpers.

```ruby
ex = experiment(:example)

# Generating the path/url using the path and url helper.
experiment_redirect_path(ex, url: 'https//gitlab.com/docs') # => "/experiment/example:20d69a...?https//gitlab.com/docs"
experiment_redirect_url(ex, url: 'https//gitlab.com/docs') # => "https://gitlab.com/experiment/example:20d69a...?https//gitlab.com/docs"

# Manually generating a url is a bit less clean, but is possible.
"#{Gitlab::Experiment::Configuration.mount_at}/#{ex.to_param}?https//docs.gitlab.com/"
```

## Testing (rspec support)

This gem comes with some rspec helpers and custom matchers.
To get the experiment specific rspec support, require the rspec support file:

```ruby
require 'gitlab/experiment/rspec'
```

Any file in `spec/experiments` path will automatically get the experiment specific support, but it can also be included
in other specs by adding the `:experiment` label:

```ruby
describe MyExampleController do
  context "with my experiment", :experiment do
    # experiment helpers and matchers will be available here.
  end
end
```

### Stub helpers

You can stub experiment variant resolution using the `stub_experiments` helper. The helper supports multiple formats for
flexibility:

**Simple hash format:**

```ruby
it "stubs experiments using hash format" do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: :red)

  experiment(:pill_color) do |e|
    expect(e).to be_enabled
    expect(e.assigned.name).to eq('red')
  end
end
```

**Hash format with options:**

```ruby
it "stubs experiments with assigned option" do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: { variant: :red, assigned: true })

  experiment(:pill_color) do |e|
    expect(e).to be_enabled
    expect(e.assigned.name).to eq('red')
  end
end
```

**Mixed formats (symbols and hashes together):**

```ruby
it "stubs multiple experiments with mixed formats" do
  stub_experiments(
    pill_color: :red,
    hippy: { variant: :free_love, assigned: true },
    yuppie: :financial_success
  )

  expect(experiment(:pill_color).assigned.name).to eq(:red)
  expect(experiment(:hippy).assigned.name).to eq(:free_love)
  expect(experiment(:yuppie).assigned.name).to eq(:financial_success)
end
```

**Boolean true (allows rollout strategy to assign):**

```ruby
it "stubs experiments while allowing the rollout strategy to assign the variant" do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: true) # only stubs enabled?

  experiment(:pill_color) do |e|
    expect(e).to be_enabled
    # expect(e.assigned.name).to eq([whatever the rollout strategy assigns])
  end
end
```

#### Testing `only_assigned` behavior

When you use the `assigned: true` option in `stub_experiments`, the `find_variant` method is automatically stubbed
to return the specified variant. This allows you to test the `only_assigned` behavior:

```ruby
it "tests only_assigned behavior with a cached variant" do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: { variant: :red, assigned: true })

  experiment_instance = experiment(:pill_color, actor: user, only_assigned: true)

  expect(experiment_instance).not_to be_excluded
  expect(experiment_instance.run).to eq('red')
end

it "tests only_assigned behavior without a cached variant" do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: :red)

  experiment_instance = experiment(:pill_color, actor: user, only_assigned: true)

  expect(experiment_instance).to be_excluded
  expect(experiment_instance.run).to eq('red')
end
```

**Note:** The `assigned: true` option only works correctly when caching is disabled. When caching is enabled,
`find_variant` will attempt to read from the actual cache store rather than using the stub. In this case, you can
populate the cache naturally by running the experiment first to assign and cache a variant before testing with
`only_assigned: true`.

### Registered behaviors matcher

It's useful to test our registered behaviors, as well as their return values when we implement anything complex in them.
The `register_behavior` matcher is useful for this. 

```ruby
it "tests our registered behaviors" do
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to register_behavior(:control)
    .with('grey') # with a default return value of "grey"
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to register_behavior(:red)
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to register_behavior(:blue)
end
```

### Exclusion and segmentation matchers

You can also easily test your experiment classes using the `exclude`, `segment` matchers.

```ruby
let(:excluded) { double(first_name: 'Richard', created_at: Time.current) }
let(:segmented) { double(first_name: 'Jeremy', created_at: 3.weeks.ago) }

it "tests the exclusion rules" do
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to exclude(actor: excluded)
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).not_to exclude(actor: segmented)
end

it "tests the segmentation rules" do
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to segment(actor: segmented)
    .into(:red) # into a specific variant
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).not_to segment(actor: excluded)
end
```

### Tracking matcher

Tracking events is a major aspect of experimentation, and because of this we try to provide a flexible way to ensure
your tracking calls are covered.

```ruby
before do
  stub_experiments(pill_color: true) # stub the experiment so tracking is permitted    
end

it "tests that we track an event on a specific instance" do
  expect(subject = experiment(:pill_color)).to track(:clicked)

  subject.track(:clicked)
end
```

You can use the `on_next_instance` chain method to specify that the tracking call could happen on the next instance of
the experiment.
This can be useful if you're calling `experiment(:example).track` downstream and don't have access to that instance.
Here's a full example of the methods that can be chained onto the `track` matcher:

```ruby
it "tests that we track an event with specific details" do
  expect(experiment(:pill_color)).to track(:clicked, value: 1, property: '_property_') 
    .on_next_instance # any time in the future
    .with_context(foo: :bar) # with the expected context
    .for(:red) # and assigned the correct variant

  experiment(:pill_color, :red, foo: :bar).track(:clicked, value: 1, property: '_property_')
end
```

## Tracking, anonymity and GDPR

We generally try not to track things like user identifying values in our experimentation.
What we can and do track is the "experiment experience" (a.k.a. the context key).

We generate this key from the context passed to the experiment.
This allows creating funnels without exposing any user information.

This library attempts to be non-user-centric, in that a context can contain things like a user or a project.

If you only include a user, that user would get the same experience across every project they view.
If you only include the project, every user who views that project would get the same experience.

Each of these approaches could be desirable given the objectives of your experiment.

## Development

After cloning the repo, run `bundle install` to install dependencies.

## Running tests

The test suite requires Redis to be running.
[Install](https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/oss_and_stack/install/archive/install-redis/) and start Redis
(`redis-server`) before running tests.

Once Redis is running, execute the tests:
`bundle exec rake`

You can also run `bundle exec pry` for an interactive prompt that will allow you to experiment.

## Contributing

Bug reports and merge requests are welcome on GitLab at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-experiment.
This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the
[Contributor Covenant](http://contributor-covenant.org) code of conduct.

Make sure to include a changelog entry in your commit message and read the [changelog entries
section](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/changelog.html).

## Release process

Please refer to the [Release Process](docs/release_process.md).

## License

The gem is available as open source under the terms of the [MIT License](http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).

## Code of conduct

Everyone interacting in the `Gitlab::Experiment` project’s codebases, issue trackers, chat rooms and mailing lists is
expected to follow the [code of conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
